6 Comments
User's avatar
Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

My complaints against Krugman are two

1) Even after "It's back' and the 'baby sitting economy,' he does not give enough emphasis to monetary policy in keeping real income growing. He clearly understands FAIT, but does not defend and explain it.

2) Since his policy positions are in principle pretty plain vanilla, it is a shame that he does not try to make them rhetorically more palatable to to the Republican curious. He only preaches to the choir.

Expand full comment
Christian Scholz's avatar

Great read as many of your other articles! Didn't PK also pioneer the literature on speculative foreign currency attacks, A model of balance-of-payments crises from 1979?

Expand full comment
Nicholas Decker's avatar

Yes, he did! Here I felt I lacked the knowledge to place to place it in context. I am only aware of Morris and Shin, but haven’t properly read it. So, I omitted it.

Expand full comment
Sniffnoy's avatar

> He thinks that old-school theories of development were perhaps unfairly treated because we could model external economies of scale,

Sorry, is this supposed to be inverted?

Expand full comment
Jimmy Becker's avatar

Beautifully written summary... Thanks

Expand full comment
Peter Angel's avatar

To be pedantic, I don't think Japan has a similar factor endowment to the US. I'm not sure how you would quantify this, but it is a much denser country with different education levels, different exports/imports, and much lower levels of natural resources and agriculture

Expand full comment